Home

Q&A Articles

Multimedia

Free Resource

Feedback


'The criteria that people use for race are based entirely on external features that we are programmed to recognize...'

­ Dr Douglas C. Wallace, (professor of molecular genetics at Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta), Do races differ? Not Really, DNA shows, New York Times web, Aug. 22, 2000.

 


 E-mail to a friend   Printer-friendly version 

Select a Pear Harbor attack photo
25k
24k
18k
25k
(courtesy John Davis)

Select to play 396k US 'infamy' speech

Japan, war, and evolution

Source: TIME Australia, August 14,1995 (p. 83). First published in CREATION Magazine Volume 18 number 2. Pages 7 to 9. December 1995 - February 1996.

This century has seen countless millions killed –more than in all known wars of human history put together – in the name of ideologies that owe their inspiration and justification directly to evolution.

The Nazis used this 'science falsely so-called' to justify treating other races as sub-human. Engaging in war, even genocide, could hardly be wrong, so they thought, since it made their version of the 'fittest' more likely to survive.

Communism's dialectic materialism required belief in evolution for intellectual respectability. Stalin's butchery is directly linked to his renunciation of God (and thus all notions of sin and judgment) after reading Darwin's book. Mao Zedong, responsible for the deaths of tens of millions, listed Darwin and Huxley as his two favourite authors.

Few have realized, however, the degree to which Japanese thinking leading up to and during World War II was also heavily influenced by Darwin.

Japanese thought blended the theistic with the evolutionary. They were a chosen people because the Emperor was a descendant of the sun goddess; they were a master race because they were more highly evolved. Japanese biologists 'produced studies decrying the apish physical features of other races (hairiness, long arms) and noting the highly evolved characteristics of the Japanese' (which included milder body odour).

The horrors of Changi, the Burma railroad, and the various death marches of World War II showed a people renowned for cultural gentility treating their wartime captives as totally subhuman. Once you have made any group of people less than human in your thinking, backed up by the authority of 'science', it becomes a powerful justification for plain old sin.

If instead of Darwinism, the scientific world had been disseminating the truth that we are all closely related, being the descendants of Adam and Eve through Noah, what a difference we could have seen in the history of the last hundred years!